#30
"Why [Company] collapsed" retrospective narrations
Commentary · low saturation · 270-day half-life
Profit score55.1
- Estimated RPM band
- $5.9–$13.7 / 1K views
Business-adjacent audience carries a high CPM; narration + archival footage format needs no host; evergreen source material.
Score components
- View velocity0.01
- Saturation inverse0.98
- CPM proxy0.23
- AI generability0.88
- Longevity0.85
- Cross-platform portability0.95
- business
- commentary
- case-study
- economics
Production cheat sheet
Commentary · 60s recommended
Script structure
- Hook
- Open with the contrarian take on the current "Why [Company] collapsed" retrospective narrations moment in under 3 seconds.
- Body
- Evidence + reasoning + the overlooked counterpoint. Aim for 3 beats.
- Payoff
- Close with the prediction or question you want the comments to argue about.
Visual sources
- Licensed clips (fair-use care): news wire + press-conference snippets
- Stock: office / interview b-roll
- AI-generated: chart / timeline overlays
Voice tone
Analytic, slightly skeptical, mid register. ElevenLabs 'Adam' at stability 0.5 / similarity 0.7.
Cross-platform
Publishable unchanged on TikTok, YouTube Shorts, and Instagram Reels.
Saturation context
Very low saturation; clean opportunity for a new voice.